![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/8/07, Jörn Engel <joern@lazybastard.org> wrote: > > > +typedef __be16 be16; > > > +typedef __be32 be32; > > > +typedef __be64 be64; > > > > Why are those typedefs necessary ? > > Not strictly. I tend to use the be* types fairly often in the code and > simply grew weary of seeing the underscores. > > Any objections if I seperate out the userspace headers and keep the > shorthands for kernel code only? Not sure what you mean but I would prefer you drop the typedefs completely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-08 21:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||