[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - NPE
    Michael-Luke Jones <> writes:

    > Already in mach-ixp4xx, so can just be called npe.c

    I want ixp4xx_ prefix in module name, otherwise I'd call it npe.c,

    > Debugging code? Can this go?

    Why? Especially with code having to work with third party binary-only
    firmware? Suicide. They are eliminated at build time = performance
    hit (OTOH this file isn't on any fast path).

    > It may be a matter of taste, but could some of the many definitions
    > at the top of ixp4xx_npe.c go in the header file here?

    It's actually not only a matter of taste, they are private
    to the .c file and I don't want to make them available to the
    public (but sure, I don't like them in .c either, I think nobody
    likes such definitions anywhere but they have to exist somewhere).
    Krzysztof Halasa
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-08 15:59    [W:0.018 / U:8.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site