![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: >> I think that maybe for 2.6.22 we should just alias MADV_FREE >> to run with the MADV_DONTNEED functionality, so that the glibc >> people can make the change on their side while we figure out >> what will be the best thing to do on the kernel side. > > No need for that. We can later extend glibc to use MADV_FREE and fall > back on MADV_DONTNEED. It's trivial to merge the MADV_FREE #defines into the kernel though, and aliasing MADV_FREE to MADV_DONTNEED for the time being is a one-liner - just an extra constant into the big switch statement in sys_madvise(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-07 04:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||