lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rfc: threaded epoll_wait thundering herd
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> On 5/5/07, Davi Arnaut <davi@haxent.com.br> wrote:
> > A google search turns up a few users. It also addresses some complaints
> > from Drepper.
>
> There is a huge problem with this approach and we're back at the
> inadequate interface.
>
> select/poll/epoll are thread cancellation points. I.e., the thread
> can be canceled before returning to the user. If this cancellation
> happens between the kernel deciding to give this thread the event (and
> no other thread) and the thread testing for cancellation in the libc
> wrapper around the syscall, then the event is lost and the process(es)
> might hang.
>
> With kevent we in the end fixed the problem by requiring that part of
> the cancellation handling the thread tries to wake up another thread
> waiting for the event queue. This is easily possible since the event
> data is in the shared memory segment and it's just purely the thread
> wakeup that is needed.

So, by the same logic, every API that 1) returns something to userspace
by canceling its internal kernel state 2) is not based on shared
kernel/userspace memory, will break under your assumptions.
Scary, because there's a pretty long list.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-08 00:49    [W:0.048 / U:22.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site