![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/6/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > What is your position on the timerfd/signalfd/etc patches? >> Seems to me that if we were to have fancy new event-delivery machinery > like kevent then the timerfd/signalfd work is heading in the other > direction and ultimately would prove to have been unneeded? That's my point. I think we ultimately have to have something like kevent and then all this *fd() work is unnecessary and just adds code to the kernel which has to be kept around and which might hinder further work in this area. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-07 05:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||