![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Commit 0b67130149b006628389ff3e8f46be9957af98aa lost the setting of tk_status
> to -EIO when there was no progress with short reads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> fs/nfs/read.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-git/fs/nfs/read.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-git.orig/fs/nfs/read.c 2007-03-13 14:35:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-git/fs/nfs/read.c 2007-03-13 14:36:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ static int nfs_readpage_retry(struct rpc
> /* This is a short read! */
> nfs_inc_stats(data->inode, NFSIOS_SHORTREAD);
> /* Has the server at least made some progress? */
> - if (resp->count == 0)
> + if (resp->count == 0) {
> + task->tk_status = -EIO;
> return 0;
> + }
>
> /* Yes, so retry the read at the end of the data */
> argp->offset += resp->count;
This doesn't look right to me. It is not an error for the NFS server
to return 0 bytes. It is usually an indication of EOF. If an error
occured, then the NFS server would have returned an error.
Thanx...
ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-04 13:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||