![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Robert Hancock wrote: > 0-3319MB > 4096-8832MB > > leaving 64MB of memory at the top of RAM uncached. What do you want to > bet that something important (kernel code?) is getting loaded there.. > > So essentially it's a BIOS problem, it's not setting up the MTRRs > properly in order to map all of RAM as cacheable. As Andi says, complain > to Intel. > Could the BADRAM patch be useful for him? http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/download.html has 2.6.21 version. It says it supports x86_64. May be using this patch he can exclude that RAM from being used/accessed? Parag -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-31 01:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||