![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@in.ibm.com] writes: > So most likely if we start disabling the interrupts > in .shutdown routine we might skip resetting adapter > on every kexec without any side affects? Not that simple. The .shutdown would need to perform more resource cleanups of the .remove call to prevent side effects. I need to move some of the .remove activity into the .shutdown handler to make sure the adapter is quiesced. I will hold off on submitting any of these changes until they are evaluated and tested; I am waiting for feedback from Yinghai on the other mitigations that I feel are closer to the root cause. Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-30 16:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||