![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On May 28 2007 19:11, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >I have not seen any explanations: >- Why did the upstream author write the code that way? I guess it's along the lines of - portability (note how this contradicts itself). Really. I have yet to figure out why everyone invents their own xxx32_t types, like e.g. glib. well, integer types, one might understand, but when it comes to gchar or gpointer, that's just plain microsoft-style (think LPCSTR and LPCVOID...) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-29 21:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||