lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
    > > > Possible further checks that might make sense:
    > > > - panic() anywhere in drivers/*
    > >
    > > A driver should be allowed to panic. E.g. if it detects that due to a
    > > firmware or driver bug memory corruption happened. IMHO the best thing
    > > to do then is panic.
    >
    > That is not how Linux normally operates. A BUG() doesn't panic() by
    > default either.
    >
    > And on systems with IOMMU that is exactly the wrong thing to do.
    >
    > Besides the problem is that bad drivers tend to badly abuse it
    > (e.g. see some particular BSD derviced SCSI drivers). We definitely
    > don't want any more of such code.

    So you prefer random data corruption over an emergency stop?
    That doesn't make much sense to me...
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-29 16:25    [W:0.037 / U:44.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site