Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 May 2007 14:38:54 +0530 | From | "Nitin Gupta" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4 |
| |
On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote: > On Monday 28 May 2007 04:37:04 Nitin Gupta wrote: > > On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote:
<snip>
> > > > As you mentioned in your mail, you are using lzo1x_1_11_compress() > > which is slower than what I ported (which is same as what is exported > > by miniLZO). So, can you please test with the version ported - this > > is found in lzo/src/lzo1x_1.c (or in minilzo.c). > > Also, can you please use 'take 5' for your next testing? > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin > > Will do. (that's DBITS=15, correct?) >
That's D_BITS=14
> However, when I averaged it 100 times, lzo1x_1_11_compress() showed better > speed than your implementation - about 1.5% faster.
I don't yet have any explanation for this.
> The *unsafe* > decompressor, however, only shows about a 1.2% speed advantage over the safe > decompressor. > > DRH > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |