![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:34:42AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Unlike many of the bogus warnings spewed by gcc, this one actually >> complains about a real bug: > > No, the calls to posix_acl_valid() in nfs4_acl_posix_to_nfsv4() ensure > that the passed-in acl has ACL_USER_OBJ, ACL_GROUP_OBJ, and ACL_OTHER > entries, and hence that these fields will always be initialized. OK > But I don't want anyone else wasting their time on this. Should we cave > in and add the initialization here just to shut up gcc? Or would a > comment here help? Given what you said above, I don't see gcc, on its best day, will ever know enough to validate that that variable is indeed always initialized. So I would vote for silencing it on those grounds. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-29 03:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||