![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/28/07, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > In any case, there's no point having cpu affinity if it's going to be > ignored. Maybe you could have two levels of affinity: 1. if set by a > root it must be obeyed; and 2. if set by an ordinary user it can be > overridden if the best interests of the system dictate. BUT I think > that would be a bad idea. Something like that already exists (at least for controlling the bounding set of allowed cpus) via cpusets. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-29 03:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||