lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 28 May 2007 18:55:52 -0700
From"Paul Menage" <>
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
On 5/28/07, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> In any case, there's no point having cpu affinity if it's going to be
> ignored. Maybe you could have two levels of affinity: 1. if set by a
> root it must be obeyed; and 2. if set by an ordinary user it can be
> overridden if the best interests of the system dictate. BUT I think
> that would be a bad idea.

Something like that already exists (at least for controlling the
bounding set of allowed cpus) via cpusets.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-29 03:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2010