lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 27 May 2007 22:23:14 -0700
From"H. Peter Anvin" <>
SubjectRe: PCIE
Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:03:29PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> ...
>>  > I can imagine many systems where the cpu simply doesn't have enough
>>  > interrupt pins to uniquely identify every possible MSI interrupt
>>  > source.
>>
>> I have a hard time imagining a PCI host bus controller that converts
>> MSI interrupts back to wire interrupts that go to pins on the CPU.
>> For one thing it would be hard to maintain the guarantee that
>> MSI interrupts can't pass DMAs.
> 
> Whatever converts the MSI back to CPU IRQ pins would have to participate
> in the "cache coherency domain". This would avoid issues around DMA ordering.
> It _could_ be on the same silicon as the PCI Host bus controller as long
> as the above is true.
> 

Also, don't forget that a lot of platforms provide *no* hardware cache
coherency.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-28 05:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008