lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
    Date
    On Sunday 27 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
    > On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:13:32 Michael Buesch wrote:
    > > On Sunday 27 May 2007 21:25:17 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
    > > > 2.6.21.1:
    > > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 58414 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
    > > > [ 5] 0.0-60.6 sec 1.13 MBytes 157 Kbits/sec
    > > > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 57837
    > > > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 2.82 MBytes 375 Kbits/sec
    > > >
    > > > 2.6.22-rc3:
    > > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 46557 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
    > > > [ 5] 0.0-60.4 sec 58.9 MBytes 8.18 Mbits/sec
    > > > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 51633
    > > > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 7.27 MBytes 967 Kbits/sec
    > >
    > > This is the diff between these two kernels.
    > > I'm not sure why you see a much better TX throughput here.
    > >
    > > Can you re-check to make sure it's not just some test-jitter?
    >
    > Oh, eh, and what I forgot to ask:
    > Do you know an old kernel that works perfectly well for you,
    > so I can look at a diff between this one and anything >=2.6.21.1.

    I don't know any, most older kernels did work fine for me, but I never user
    iperf there so I guess if the bug is there also I simply didn't trigger it.
    If you think it's usefull I could go back and try different kernels, but that
    would take some time.
    Except the iperf bug 2.6.21.1 and 2.6.22-rc3 work fine.

    Maxi
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-27 23:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site