lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
Date
On Sunday 27 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:13:32 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 May 2007 21:25:17 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > > 2.6.21.1:
> > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 58414 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
> > > [ 5] 0.0-60.6 sec 1.13 MBytes 157 Kbits/sec
> > > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 57837
> > > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 2.82 MBytes 375 Kbits/sec
> > >
> > > 2.6.22-rc3:
> > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 46557 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
> > > [ 5] 0.0-60.4 sec 58.9 MBytes 8.18 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 51633
> > > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 7.27 MBytes 967 Kbits/sec
> >
> > This is the diff between these two kernels.
> > I'm not sure why you see a much better TX throughput here.
> >
> > Can you re-check to make sure it's not just some test-jitter?
>
> Oh, eh, and what I forgot to ask:
> Do you know an old kernel that works perfectly well for you,
> so I can look at a diff between this one and anything >=2.6.21.1.

I don't know any, most older kernels did work fine for me, but I never user
iperf there so I guess if the bug is there also I simply didn't trigger it.
If you think it's usefull I could go back and try different kernels, but that
would take some time.
Except the iperf bug 2.6.21.1 and 2.6.22-rc3 work fine.

Maxi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-27 23:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site