lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again
* William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
>> I remember. It was far beyond "slightly async;" they would drift
>> minutes apart during reasonable amounts of uptime, though it would
>> take at least several days to drift so far (I don't recall how long it
>> took).

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, that's what i meant under 'slightly async'. Some AMD CPUs are like
> that too and sched_clock() now handles that fine. So we should try my
> patch.

Sorry, then. I took slight to mean something else. In any event I was
only quantifying things. I've no opinion whatsoever on the impact of
the code on NUMA-Q, only some recall of its operating characteristics.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-25 10:39    [W:0.256 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site