lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again
    * William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
    >> I remember. It was far beyond "slightly async;" they would drift
    >> minutes apart during reasonable amounts of uptime, though it would
    >> take at least several days to drift so far (I don't recall how long it
    >> took).

    On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > yes, that's what i meant under 'slightly async'. Some AMD CPUs are like
    > that too and sched_clock() now handles that fine. So we should try my
    > patch.

    Sorry, then. I took slight to mean something else. In any event I was
    only quantifying things. I've no opinion whatsoever on the impact of
    the code on NUMA-Q, only some recall of its operating characteristics.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-25 10:39    [W:0.019 / U:0.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site