[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again
* William Lee Irwin III <> wrote:
>> I remember. It was far beyond "slightly async;" they would drift
>> minutes apart during reasonable amounts of uptime, though it would
>> take at least several days to drift so far (I don't recall how long it
>> took).

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, that's what i meant under 'slightly async'. Some AMD CPUs are like
> that too and sched_clock() now handles that fine. So we should try my
> patch.

Sorry, then. I took slight to mean something else. In any event I was
only quantifying things. I've no opinion whatsoever on the impact of
the code on NUMA-Q, only some recall of its operating characteristics.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-25 10:39    [W:0.141 / U:1.452 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site