lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Ingo: to make things easier, the _best_ split-up would be not "this is
> the historical series of patches leading up to CFS v15" or something
> like that, but it would be nice to get that final CFS version as a
> series of patches that do some specific things rather than as one
> final one. Is there any possibility that could happen?

sure enough, i'll work something sane out - i already have it partly
split up. It will probably be something along the lines of: 'remove
stuff that we can remove and still have functional scheduling' followed
by an 'add minimal CFS patch' and then nicely split up 'CFS related
add-ons' (like the task-stats accounting things, debugging, etc). Do you
think i should try to split up the core CFS bits some more beyond this
level? (that would be quite nontrivial i suspect)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-25 21:17    [W:0.155 / U:25.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site