![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/25/07, Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/24/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/25/07, Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 5/24/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/23/07, Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 5/23/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com> wrote: > > [ 237.556167] LZO compress successful: orig_size=17448, comp_size=8183 > [ 253.320760] LZO decompress successful: decomp_size=17448 > > 2221c586e3eb869af7f4333d4f56b441b9aa8414 test-input > 2e6c96b687274b629308b29835cebd3af989e0c7 output > > ppc however seems bust > the computer is a g4 mini Since lzo1x_decompress() itself is saying that decompression was successful, it is really strange to have different sha-sums. It seems that it's the fault with compress-test module itself. I will look more closely into this and reply back. Thanks, Nitin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-25 17:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||