lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add "notime" boot option
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 05/23/2007 10:55 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>>>>> That's a good source of confusion. To me, "notime" means something
>>>>> like "don't bother calculating time", instead of the proposed
>>>>> behavior. Can't it be something like 'nologts' (no log timestamps)
>>>>> or nots or notimestamps or nologtime instead
>>>>
>>>> "nologtime" is OK with me. or does it confuse people in a different
>>>> way? Anyone else?
>>>
>>> The CONFIG option is called CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME. How about
>>> "noprintktime"? At least nicely to the point...
>>
>> Actually I'm concerned about total kernel command line length,
>> so using option names that are "long" when short will do is not good IMO.
>>
>> I.e., I can easily overflow a 255-byte command line length buffer,
>> so Shorter is Better.
>
> Okay. I would by the way not be against turning the timestamping off by
> default and turning it _on_ with a "timestamps" or "logtime" or whatever
> option. The information is sometimes handy for seeing the (clustering
> of) event times so I've been compiling it in for a while on some boxes
> but in the majority case for me it's noise taking up printk real estate...

But CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is what controls its "default" (build-time) value.
I.e., users can control that.

I would be OK with removing that config option and only being able to
enable it, but I doubt that this would have much support. ;)

--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-24 07:09    [W:0.262 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site