lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Date
From
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
> Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
> >> Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
> >> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :( ...
> >
> > If only it would fix all of them...
> >
> > Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
> > 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
> > 2.6.21 was released).
>
> Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of
> the bugs haven't appeared.
>
> Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...

Hi,

If there is a new stable 2.6.20 / 2.6.21, would it be possible that they both contain also this patch to keep the same behaviour between 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 kernels regarding paravirt_ops GPL export?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7

Thnx!

- vin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-23 03:31    [W:0.728 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site