lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes
Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Jan -
>
> I ran 2.6.21 + your udf patches from -mm through some udf tests which,
> oddly enough, can be found in the xfstests test suite in xfsprogs cvs
> from sgi.
>
> It looks much better than before, but I was able to trip some of your
> asserts. They were generated while fsx was running. The good news,
> though, is that fsx passed. :) I haven't looked into it much further
> yet, but wanted to let you know.

Here's a short hacky testcase that trips the assert around line 123 of
udf/truncate.c I'm looking into it but you may immediately see what the
problem is...?


#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main(int argc, char ** argv)
{
int fd;
char buf[65536];

fd = open("testfile", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT);
lseek(fd, 16797, SEEK_SET);
write(fd, buf, 22935);
close(fd);

fd = open("testfile", O_WRONLY);
lseek(fd, 31281, SEEK_SET);
write(fd, buf, 9592);
close(fd);
}

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-22 22:43    [W:0.153 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site