lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/32] Blackfin update for 2.6.22-rc2
Date
On Mon 21 May 2007 13:36, Mike Frysinger pondered:
> On 5/21/07, Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> > since there is noMMU, are we better:
> > - putting stubs (return ENOSYS - give runtime errors), or
> > - just ignore the errors - and give compile errors? (Is there any way to
> > put something into the syscall table, as not to get the warnings?)
>
> there are no compile errors ... having a stub that returns -ENOSYS is
> the same thing as not having a stub as the fallback code when given an
> unknown syscall # will return -ENOSYS ...

So, is there a way to tell ./scripts/checksyscalls.sh that here is a list of
syscalls that we can't do/have chosen not to implement - so we can live with
the common fallback code, and not get the warnings?

-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-21 23:53    [W:0.079 / U:9.408 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site