lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> Well, it might be just because I'm used to what I call 'locked
> enter/leave' model. If people don't find that easier to understand, no
> objection from me and kudos to Oleg for getting it right from the beginning.

I think most people here, at least me too, are used to the same.
At first I didn't even think whether Oleg's feelings about these
barriers were right - it was obvious to me any barriers (!) should
be avoided.

But while reading David's manual I started to doubt: there had to
be some reasons these CPUs were done such nasty way. And probably
it wasn't about punishing the programmers. So, maybe sometimes
good, old habits aren't the best advisors...

Cheers,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-21 12:07    [W:0.118 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site