lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Ext3 vs NTFS performance
    On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:21:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
    > >
    > > Conceivably we could address this in the filesystem without mucking other
    > > things up. But I'd have thought the simplest damage-control would be to
    > > detect this pattern in samba and to then use glibc's fallocate().
    >
    > The advantage of detecting it in kernel would be that it would handle
    > Linux applications that do this (I suspect there are some) too.

    Um, which applications do you suspect? So we can hunt down those user
    space applications programmers and slap them silly? Or rather,
    unsilly, since that there's no good reason to ever suspect that
    writing a byte every 128k would result in a good allocation layout on disk?

    - Ted
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-02 18:11    [W:0.026 / U:1.968 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site