![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Alan Cox wrote: >> I just so happen to think we should implement a variety of CPU resource >> limits beyond what we now do, so this, too, interests me. > > Agreed - and make them all 64bit while doing the cleanup. One thing > several Unixen have we don't for 32bi boxes is a proper set of 64bit > resource handling for memory/file etc. > > We could also start using the CPU facilities to enforce some of > the really interesting real time process ones (like main memory > bandwidth) that at the moment we have no control over and can lead to > very unfair behaviour. > > Alan Hi, Alan, Thanks for bringing this up. There are a couple of patches posted to lkml for RSS control (unmapped page cache controller under development). http://lwn.net/Articles/223829/ and the new enhanced verison by Pavel at http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/6456480.html We would appreciate any feedback to help us move the work forward and make the code ready for acceptance -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-02 05:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||