![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Chris Snook wrote: > eugene@ns.armcci.am wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Chris Snook wrote: >> >> > eugene@ns.armcci.am wrote: >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >> > > >> > > I have Pentium D CPU, which many Windows utilities like cpuz, wcpuid, >> > > everest identify as D 930 (Dual Core, 3GHz). From Intel site I find >> > > out >> > > that it has no HT feature, nor Windows XP identify it as HT. >> > > >> > > Why do I have "ht" flag in cpuinfo? >> > > ----------------------------------- >> > >> > The "ht" flag merely means "I know how to report hyperthreaded logical >> > processors if I have them." My Woodcrest Xeon 5110 and my Athlon64 X2 >> > both have the "ht" flag, and correctly report the zero hyperthreaded >> > logical processors they each have. >> > >> > -- Chris >> > >> > >> >> Thanks, Chris. >> >> Am I right that is chipset on mainboard, who is saying - "I know....", not >> CPU itself? Is it better to switch off HT support in BIOS? >> Is it possible to generate CPU name as: "Pentium D 930" in /proc/cpuinfo? >> On the other server I have some 2GHz HT Xeons which can't be identified on >> Intel site because of strange naming pattern. >> I tried to find any utility for Linux to solve this, but it looks like >> everybody are using /pros/cpuinfo, which is not enough :) >> >> Regards, Eugene. > > While the BIOS can disable HT, the ability to *report* HT or the lack thereof > is within the CPU itself. I doubt my socket AM2 board has the faintest clue > what HT is. > > As for human-readable names, the model name in /proc/cpuinfo comes from the > processor name string, and includes however much or little information the > vendor thinks the lay user wants to know. If you want more detail, you can > always interpret the model, stepping, and other related fields to determine > the model number. > > If you don't want to manually look up model info on a CPU version table, > x86info and dmidecode will give you more information. > > -- Chris > As I already told, there is no stepping 4 for Xeons on Intel site! So /proc/cpuinfo, dmidecode, x86info are all wrong. Moreover, x86info is too old and can't work with /sys fs. Also Linux is poor on giving FSB and Memory frequency, which I need to be sure that memory timing is correct (SPD gives slower parameters then are on SDRAM labels :( ). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-19 07:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||