lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 17 May 2007 23:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
FromDavide Libenzi <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] timerfd/eventfd context lock doesn't protect against poll_wait
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Davi Arnaut wrote:

> Hi,> > poll_wait() callback may modify the waitqueue without holding the
> context private lock.

Thx Davi, patch is correct. Nice catch. But at this point instead of 
ending up getting two locks, we may look into using Andrew suggestion of 
reusing the waitqueue lock. Is it universally considered a "legal" 
operation?

- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-18 08:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008