[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:09:50 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy
> <> wrote:
> umm.. I'd say what you've done in there is an improvement to the
> exiting stuff: getting gcc to check it is better than having to use
> sparse.
> I'd have expected gcc to generate poorer code with your approach but I'm
> showing zero text size changes from Christoph's patch (gcc-4.1 and
> gcc-3.4.5).
On which arch did you try ?
X86 where unaligned access are ok ?

On arch that don't support aligned access, packed struct access will be
done byte per byte (but it could be the expected behavior if there
unaligned access).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-17 22:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean