Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 May 2007 22:13:38 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: CFS Scheduler and real-time tasks |
| |
* Török Edvin <edwintorok@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > >note: you ran it on a dual-core system and the SMP load-balancer needs > >time to gain precision in the non-RT test - so i'd suggest to test it > >much longer than 10 seconds: 300 seconds at least. > > Thanks, running for 300 seconds shows only a 2% error. Even running a > I/O workload while running the massive_intr test keeps the same error.
hey, cool! Also try -v13 - it should be even more tighter.
> BTW, the system is more 'responsive'. For example starting > applications while running the tests, switching windows, moving > windows is much "smoother" than on default scheduler.
yeah :)
> [while true;do cp /usr/portage/distfiles/linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 . && > sync && rm linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 && sync; done] > > ./massiv_new 9 300 > 020860 00017782 > 020858 00017774 > > RT JOB:020865 00003785 > > 020859 00017048 > 020862 00017387 > 020855 00017494 > 020861 00017245 > 020863 00017492 > 020864 00017122
looks pretty good!
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |