lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CFS Scheduler and real-time tasks

* Török Edvin <edwintorok@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there something I am doing wrong, or is the precision decrease
> expected, when running real-time tasks too?

yeah: real-time tasks are ueber-tasks that just get all CPU time
immediately. I guess we could make SCHED_RR be covered by CFS accounting
eventually.

> Very precise indeed, the default scheduler produces lots of different
> timings there.

note: you ran it on a dual-core system and the SMP load-balancer needs
time to gain precision in the non-RT test - so i'd suggest to test it
much longer than 10 seconds: 300 seconds at least.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-17 21:27    [W:0.034 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site