[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > > I've been semi watching this, and the only comment I really can give
    > > is that I hate the name.  To me, logfs implies a filesystem for
    > > logging purposes, not for Flash hardware with wear leveling issues to
    > > be taken into account.
    > Yeah, well, ...
    > Two years ago when I started all this, I was looking for a good name.
    > All I could come up with sounded stupid, so I picked "LogFS" as a code
    > name.  As soon as I find a better name, the code name should get
    > replaced.

    When doing a google search on logfs, there are less than five results
    among the first 100 that don't refer to your work. The other two listed
    in there are also log-structured file systems: The inferno flash file
    system ( and the
    (discontinued) file system named lfs from the 2005 google summer of

    I'd say the name should stay, changing it now can only add more confusion.

    Arnd <><
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-17 13:43    [W:0.020 / U:42.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site