Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2007 14:16:50 -0500 | From | Jeffrey Hundstad <> | Subject | Re: filesystem benchmarking fun |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote: >>> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute. compilebench shows the >>> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a >>> bunch of >>> kernel trees. >> >> I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/19/33 ] > > Shouldn't that option be renamed to 'corrupt_my_data'? ;-)
Perhaps maybe "my_power_never_fails". > > Jeff > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |