[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem?
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 12 2007 07:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
>>> reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
>>> creation time during readdir().
>> There is no assumption. Mercurial explicitly visits files in
>> alphabetical order for the above commands.
> But who says that
> for i in {a..z}; do ## {..} is a bash3 extension
> touch $i;
> done;
> actually makes readdir() return them in the same order?

Nobody. But doing a readdir, sorting the results and visiting the files
in that order does mean you'll visit them in alphabetical order. Hence
"explicitly visits".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-14 22:31    [W:0.495 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site