[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata: add human-readable error value decoding
    Tejun Heo wrote:
    > Chuck Ebbert wrote:
    >> Robert Hancock wrote:
    >>>>> + ehc->i.serror & SERR_TRANS_ST_ERROR ? "TransStatTransErr "
    >>>>> : "",
    >>>>> + ehc->i.serror & SERR_UNRECOG_FIS ? "UnrecogFIS " : "",
    >>>>> + ehc->i.serror & SERR_DEV_XCHG ? "DevExchanged " : "" );
    >>>> I'm not really convinced whether this is necessary. The human readable
    >>>> form is also a bit cryptic and can get quite long. So, mild NACK from
    >>>> me.
    >>> It certainly seems useful when debugging hotplug issues or random SATA
    >>> problems which end up being caused by communication problems. Without
    >>> this output, Joe User stands no chance of figuring out what's going on,
    >>> and neither does Joe libata Developer unless they really care to dig
    >>> through the spec and count bits to figure out what they mean. At least
    >>> with this you can see that there was a CRC error, etc. and go from that..
    >> Why not just document the error messages?
    >> And the scsi ones too, I can't seem to find what the sense codes mean.
    > They are well documented elsewhere - the standard documents. For sense
    > codes, For SError bits, You can get drafts free of
    > charge.

    The ATA ones are more of a pain in that regard than SCSI though - SCSI
    has all distinct error codes for different errors, whereas ATA has
    bitmasks for everything..

    Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    To email, remove "nospam" from
    Home Page:

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-12 01:13    [W:0.038 / U:2.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site