Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 May 2007 17:04:21 -0400 | Subject | Re: post 2.6.21 regression in F_GETLK | From | "J. Bruce Fields" <> |
| |
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:01:05PM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > You are partly right on the test however note that it is using a start > and len that are specific to the RDLCK so that should _only_ conflict > with that lock. I did notice that the LTP test is taking a new lock on > the entire file which should be blocked by eithe rthe RDLCK or the WRLCK > and it doesn't check both, I plan on fixing that once this is resolved. > > But, much more importantly F_GETLK is returning F_UNLCK saying that > there was no conflict at all.
Argh, OK. I still can't see the problem yet, then. What filesystem is this on?
--b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |