[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:45 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > It'd be nicer if there were a "struct boot_params" declaration, but we
> > can't have everything.
> It's in my patchset-under-development.

Ah ha: excellent!

> > +typedef unsigned long long u64;
> > typedef uint32_t u32;
> > typedef uint16_t u16;
> > typedef uint8_t u8;
> Why not uint64_t to go along with all the other defines?

Because then it's a PITA to printf(): x86-64 has uint64_t as "unsigned
long". So the lguest64 guys will add all kinds of horrible casts. This
has the same effect, but ironically is more portable.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-01 06:05    [W:0.131 / U:2.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site