lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 30 Apr 2007 22:28:55 -0700
From"H. Peter Anvin" <>
SubjectRe: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> BTW, wrt. a new "platform type" field, should it go something like this?
> 
> -0235/3	N/A	pad2		Unused
> +0235/1	2.07+	platform_type	Runtime platform (see below)
> +0236/2	N/A	pad2		Unused
> ...
> +  platform_type:
> +	For kernels which can boot on multiple platforms.  Currently
> +	0 == native (normal), 1 == lguest (paravirtualized).
> 

Well, yes, but we need to think about if there is more things that
should be added.  There *definitely* should be space for a platform data
pointer, to start out with.  I would also like to see a platform data
field, as well as a bootloader extension field (we're going to have that
problem soon enough.)

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-01 05:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008