Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:51:16 +0200 | From | Rene Herman <> | Subject | Re: Ten percent test |
| |
On 04/08/2007 12:41 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this is pretty hard to get right, and the most objective way to change > it is to do it testcase-driven. FYI, interactivity tweaking has been > gradual, the last bigger round of interactivity changes were done a year > ago: > > commit 5ce74abe788a26698876e66b9c9ce7e7acc25413 > Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> > Date: Mon Apr 10 22:52:44 2006 -0700 > > [PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation > > (and a few smaller tweaks since then too.) > > and that change from Mike responded to a testcase. Mike's latest changes > (the ones you just tested) were mostly driven by actual testcases too, > which measured long-term timeslice distribution fairness.
Ah yes, that one. Here's the next one in that series:
commit f1adad78dd2fc8edaa513e0bde92b4c64340245c Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Date: Sun May 21 18:54:09 2006 -0700
Revert "[PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation"
It personally had me wonder if _anyone_ was testing this stuff...
Rene.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |