![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Saturday, 7 April 2007 11:47, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that. > > > > BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because > > timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU. > > yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the > on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right > solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the > clock_was_set() functionality. Agreed. Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-07 09:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||