![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that. > > BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because > timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU. yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the clock_was_set() functionality. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-07 09:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||