lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: If not readdir() then what?

On Apr 7 2007 16:36, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
>So how do we solve this problem? I can think of two solutions:
>
>1) Deprecate telldir/seekdir() altogether. Relatively few progams use
>this functionality, and it is highly questionable how useful it is,
>anyway. If you use telldir/seekdir and keep the cookie for a long
>time, even the POSIX-provided guarantees about files that are created
>and deleted between the telldir() and seekdir() points in time makes
>its utility highly dubious.
>
>2) If application programs must have telldir/seekdir, than expand the
>size of the cookie from 32-bits to a minimum of 128 bits, and
>preferably larger --- say 512 bits, to accomodate systems that might
>be using 512-bit variant of SHA-2. [...]

Maybe a combination of both? That is, replace telldir by an
independent emulation layer.


Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-08 01:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans