lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: missing madvise functionality
Nick Piggin a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> This was not a working patch, just to throw the idea, since the
>> answers I got showed I was not understood.
>>
>> In this case, find_extend_vma() should of course have one struct
>> vm_area_cache * argument, like find_vma()
>>
>> One single cache on one mm is not scalable. oprofile badly hits it on
>> a dual cpu config.
>
> Oh, what sort of workload are you using to show this? The only reason
> that I
> didn't submit my thread cache patches was that I didn't show a big enough
> improvement.
>

Database workload, where the user multi threaded app is constantly accessing
GBytes of data, so L2 cache hit is very small. If you want to oprofile it,
with say a CPU_CLK_UNHALTED:5000 event, then find_vma() is in the top 5.

Each time oprofile has an NMI, it calls find_vma(EIP/RIP) and blows out the
target process cache (usually plugged on the data vma containing user land
futexes). Event with private futexes, it will probably be plugged on the brk()
vma.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-05 08:13    [W:0.252 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site