Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:44:57 -0400 | From | Tony Lindgren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/90] Post 2.6.21 OMAP update |
| |
* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> [070404 14:37]: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:27:30 -0400 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [070404 14:02]: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Attached is a rather large OMAP update for post 2.6.21. > > > > > > OMAP is a series of ARM processors from Texas Instruments > > > used in various cell phones and PDAs. > > > > > > The patch series is based on code that has been brewing > > > in the linux-omap tree since last fall. > > > > > > We'd like to switch the linux-omap tree to use the mainline > > > tree for core omap stuff, and this series attemps to do it > > > for most part. > > > > > > As the patch series is big, Andrew Morton asked me to post > > > it to LKML instead of linux-arm-kernel list for a wider review, > > > so please comment on the patches if you have a chance! > > > > > > The patches touch only omap specific code at: > > > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig > > > arch/arm/plat-omap > > > arch/arm/mach-omap1 > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2 > > > include/asm-arm/arch-omap > > > > Looks like using git-send-email --chain-reply-to with this many > > messages is not a good idea... The threading gets nested too wide :) > > That's only a problem when there are <too many> patches to be > reviewed. Hence, do more frequent postings of fewer patches per series. > That will likely also get you more reviewers.
Yeah, I agree.. We've already missed two merge windows because of the large patch set :( The problem is that patch set just keeps growing.
Things should be to normal small patch sets once this pile is dealt with.
Regards,
Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |