![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > Yeah, a new-id patch is a pretty critical bugfix if you happen to have that > hardware. I'll get all these into 2.6.22 by whatever means and will adopt > your advice in future. > > Probably these should go into -stable too, but I don't know what > Greg&Chris's position is on new device IDs. I don't know either. But a one-line ID patch is pretty painless considering the gain, so I would vote for stable@kernel.org taking such patches. If it's more than one line added per ID though, NAK for -stable, IMO... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-01 02:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||