lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Lower HD transfer rate with NCQ enabled?
    Date
    >>Q: What conclusion can I make on "hdparm -t" results or can I make any 
    >>conclusions? Do I really have lower performance with NCQ or not? If I do,
    >>is this because of my HD or because of kernel?
    >
    >What IO scheduler are you using? If AS or CFQ, could you try with deadline?

    I was using CFQ. I now tried with Deadline and that doesn't seem to degrade
    the performance at all! With Deadline I got 60MB/s both with and without
    NCQ. This was with "hdparm -t".

    So what does this tell us?

    _________________________________________________________________
    Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
    http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-03 23:33    [W:0.021 / U:60.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site