Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.21 | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:33:30 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 00:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Don't be silly, did any of the developers say, that he has spare time to > > read your regression lists ? > > It worked because several people (including Linus) emphasized that > fixing regressions from this list was important.
Right. Simply because these lists are assembled by someone
- who knows how to pick that reports from the mailinglists - who knows how to sort them in a useful way - who knows how to add the relevant folks on CC - ....
Can you see the pattern ?
> And it failed because many regressions still stayed unfixed and some > even undebugged.
No it failed not. It is not perfect. Way more bugs, which have been fixed or are in the debugging process, would have been unnoticed and ignored otherwise.
> > So what are you complaining about ? Folks stepped up and built a > > regression list and posted it to LKML. What's wrong with that ? > > If it works it's perfectly fine.
It will work not much different from your lists. It'll be not perfect either.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |