Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:30:30 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6 |
| |
* Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> > know of any other reports then please let me know!) > > There was Caglar Onur too but he said he will redo all the tests. > [...]
well, Caglar said CFSv7 works as well as CFSv6 in his latest tests and that he'll redo all the tests to re-verify his original regression report :)
> In fact, what I'd like to see in 2.6.22 is something better for > everybody and with *no* regression, even if it's not perfect. > > I had the feeling that SD matched that goal right now, [...]
curious, which are the reports where in your opinion CFS behaves worse than vanilla? There were two audio skipping reports against CFS, the most serious one got resolved and i hope the other one has been resolved by the same fix as well. (i'm still waiting for feedback on that one)
> [...] except for Mike who has not tested recent versions. [...]
actually, dont discount Mark Lord's test results either. And it might be a good idea for Mike to re-test SD 0.46?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |