lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6

    * Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

    > I don't know if Mike still has problems with SD, but there are now
    > several interesting reports of SD giving better feedback than CFS on
    > real work. In my experience, CFS seems smoother on *technical* tests,
    > which I agree that they do not really simulate real work.

    well, there are several reports of CFS being significantly better than
    SD on a number of workloads - and i know of only two reports where SD
    was reported to be better than CFS: in Kasper's test (where i'd like to
    know what the "3D stuff" he uses is and take a good look at that
    workload), and another 3D report which was done against -v6. (And even
    in these two reports the 'smoothness advantage' was not dramatic. If you
    know of any other reports then please let me know!)

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-29 09:03    [W:2.288 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site