Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:04:29 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) |
| |
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:15:50PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> with dynaticks now in the kernel it may even be possible to have the idle > process decide that the next event is far enough away that it should > suspend-to-ram until that point.
This would be ideal (and it's broadly what the OLPC guys are aiming for, I think), but on most platforms you're looking at at least a second or so to resume. As far as I know, we're still looking at ~60 ticks a second at best for an average desktop, so that's not going to be a win.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |