Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:48:00 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review |
| |
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Bryan WU wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote: > > > > > > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and > > > long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. > > > > Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org > > releases :) > > > > Yeah, but we are the vendor as you mentioned. -:))
Ah, then you already know what to do :)
> If we wanna to release a kernel to customer product development, how to > choose the stable version?
That's up to you.
> Currently, we always followed the kernel release cycle/rules and give > customer the latest stable version.
Ok, then what has really changed here? We've been doing this .y release thing (also called -stable) for about 2 years now, nothing is different this week from last.
Confused,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |